Comments on: Adapting to Volatility: Strategic Position Sizing for Algorithmic Traders https://easylanguagemastery.com/building-strategies/percent-risk-and-volatility-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=percent-risk-and-volatility-2 Helping you Master EasyLanguage Sun, 13 Apr 2025 13:06:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3 By: Temp Edu Mail https://easylanguagemastery.com/building-strategies/percent-risk-and-volatility-2/#comments/1008709 Sun, 13 Apr 2025 13:06:01 +0000 http://systemtradersuccess.com/?p=2748#comment-1008709 Your ability to distill complex concepts into digestible nuggets of wisdom is truly remarkable. I always come away from your blog feeling enlightened and inspired. Keep up the phenomenal work!

]]>
By: Jeff Swanson https://easylanguagemastery.com/building-strategies/percent-risk-and-volatility-2/#comments/1008412 Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:17:38 +0000 http://systemtradersuccess.com/?p=2748#comment-1008412 In reply to Dave.

The S&P 500’s long-term return of 14% annually since 2012 is indeed impressive, but comparing it to an algorithmic trading system, especially one focused on S&P futures, overlooks several nuances. Here’s why a strategy like this holds value:

Drawdown Management: The S&P 500’s historical returns don’t reflect the risk or drawdowns investors endured along the way (e.g., the 2020 COVID crash). An algorithmic trading system can offer tighter control over drawdowns. For example, if your strategy has a 10% maximum drawdown compared to the S&P’s ~30%+ during crises, it provides a smoother equity curve and less emotional stress.

Capital Efficiency: Algorithmic strategies typically do not tie up capital 100% of the time. A system trading S&P futures might take a few high-probability trades per month, freeing capital to be deployed in other strategies or markets. This allows you to diversify, improving your portfolio’s overall performance and reducing single-market dependency.

Portfolio Building: One strategy might not outperform the S&P consistently, but combining multiple uncorrelated systems across different markets (e.g., S&P, Crude Oil, Gold) creates a robust portfolio. A well-diversified portfolio smooths returns and reduces reliance on any single market’s performance, which is crucial for long-term success.

Non-correlation Benefits: Futures-based strategies, even when trading the S&P, often have low correlation to buy-and-hold equity approaches. This makes them a valuable addition to portfolios heavily exposed to equities, offering protection and alternative income streams during bear markets.

Algo trading isn’t about a single trading system but building a portfolio that manages risk, smooths returns, and grows capital consistently under diverse market conditions.

]]>
By: Dave https://easylanguagemastery.com/building-strategies/percent-risk-and-volatility-2/#comments/1008410 Wed, 11 Dec 2024 03:36:27 +0000 http://systemtradersuccess.com/?p=2748#comment-1008410 Wait, but the return on S&P 500 since 2012 has been over 14% per year and over 531% return. Help me understand the value?

]]>
By: Jeff Swanson https://easylanguagemastery.com/building-strategies/percent-risk-and-volatility-2/#comments/7022 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 18:36:45 +0000 http://systemtradersuccess.com/?p=2748#comment-7022 In reply to Windy.

I generally stay away from the Kelly formula because it’s often too aggressive. But it would be kind of interesting worth testing. I’ll put it on the to-do list and update the article. Thanks for the email!

]]>
By: Windy https://easylanguagemastery.com/building-strategies/percent-risk-and-volatility-2/#comments/7021 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:56:26 +0000 http://systemtradersuccess.com/?p=2748#comment-7021 Could you test by, after the 60th trade, using the Kelly formula:

Kelly % = W – [(1 – W) / R]

Where:
W = Winning probability
R = Win/loss ratio

This should give a much larger profit.

See: Money Management Using The Kelly Criterion https://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/04/091504.asp#ixzz5PPFHZmgl

]]>